COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD
I.§3-171-3 Adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules.
When pursuant a petition therefore , or upon the chief elections officer’s
own motion, the chief election officer proposes to adopt, amend, or repeal
a rule, the rule shall be adopted, amended, or repealed in according to
procedures set forth in Chapter 91 and section 92-41, HRS
§3-171-4 Conduct of hearing. (a) The chief election officer shall afford
all interested persons the opportunity to submit data, views, or argument.
(3)(b) The chief election officer or the designated representative shall
conduct the public hearing
Petitioners demand a public hearing seeking modification of elections rules
in order to close an existing loophole, which allows an ineligible candidate to
put his name on the ballot as a candidate for the U.S. President in violation of
the Natural Born Citizen provision. Petitioners are seeking to add a procedure
allowing members of the public and U.S. voters to inspect identification records
and eligibility records of the presidential and vice presidential candidates, in
order to uphold and protect citizens inalienable civil and human right to lawful
elections, free of fraud and forgery.
This issue came to light during the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.
Recently released passport records of his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, show ,
that after her second marriage, Ms. Dunham took the last name of her second
husband and went by the name Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro. In 1968 Ms.
Dunham Soetoro applied to renew her U.S. passport. On page 2 of her renewal
application, under” Amend to include/exclude children”, she excluded her son
Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah. (Exhibit 10 (a) Passport records of Stanley Ann
Dunham with her dependent son listed under the name Barack Hussein Obama
Soebarkah.)
Exhibit 10(b) shows Barack Obama’s school registration in Indonesia,
provided by the Associated Press and acknowledged by Mr. Obama. It lists him
using his step father’s last name Soetoro. It is common in South East Asia:
Indonesia and India, to blend names together, which might explain Soebarkah, as
a blend of Obama’s last name by his step father, Indonesian citizen Lolo
Soetoro, and his first name Barack, to create a moniker, a blended name
Soebarkah.
There is no record of Mr. Obama ever legally changing his name from Soetoro
or Soebarkah to Obama. As such he cannot be on the ballot without ascertaining
his legal name. One cannot run for the U.S. President under a name, which is not
legally his. Until this recent release of Mr. Obama’s mother’s passport records,
the name Soebarkah was not known and was not brought forward during the 2008
campaign.
Additionally, in his school registration records, his citizenship is listed
as Indonesian, as such, as a foreign national, he cannot be the US
President.
Additionally, Taitz found out that Social Security number 042-68-4425,
which is used by Obama in his tax returns and his Selective Service
registration, is not legally his according to E-Verify and Social Security
Number Verification systems records, as well as the fact, that an alleged copy
of his long form birth certificate, posted by Obama online on WhiteHouse.gov,
represents a computer generated forgery and not a true and correct copy of the
original document.
Taitz filed multiple legal challenges to obtain access to and inspection of
the records in question, however Director of Health Loretta Fuddy and Registrar
Onaka, as well the court system in HI are being complicit in the cover up
of this forgery and elections fraud and refusing to allow inspection of the
original birth certificate allegedly on file in lieu of the alleged copy.
II. COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD
ELECTION LAW COMPLAINT FORM, SEEKING TO REMOVE FROM THE BALLOT PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE FROM DEMOCRAT PARTY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II DUE TO SUSPECTED
ELECTIONS FRAUD, LACK OF ELIGIBILITY, LACK OF PROOF OF NATURAL BORN US CITIZEN
STATUS DUE TO LACK OF ANY LEGAL AND VERIFIABLE IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS AND DUE
TO FRAUDULENT USE OF A CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042 -68-4425, WHICH
WAS NEVER ASSIGNED TO HIM ACCORDING TO E-VERIFY AND SSNVS, AND DUE TO USE OF A
COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY INSTEAD OF A VALID LONG FORM U.S. BIRTH CERTIFICATE,
as well as use of a name, which does not correspond with official passport and
school records of the candidate, where he previously used last names Soetoro and
Soebarkah, not Obama.
JURISDICTION AND PERTINENT LAW
CHAPTER 19
ELECTION OFFENSE
Section
19-1 Classes of offenses
19-2 Repealed
19-3 Election frauds
19-3.5 Voter fraud
19-4 Penalties; disqualification for, removal from
office;
reports of convictions to chief election officer
19-5 Repealed
19-6 Misdemeanors
19-7 to 9 Repealed
Previous Vol01_Ch0001-0042F Next
§11-113 Presidential ballots. (a) In presidential elections, the names of
the candidates for president and vice president shall be used on the ballot in
lieu of the names of the presidential electors, and the votes cast for president
and vice president of each political party shall be counted for the presidential
electors and alternates nominated by each political party.
(c) All candidates
for president and vice president of the United States shall be qualified for
inclusion on the general election ballot under either of the following
procedures:
(B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve
under the provisions of the United States Constitution;
(d) Each applicant
and the candidates named, shall be notified in writing of the applicant’s or
candidate’s eligibility or disqualification for placement on the ballot not
later than 4:30 p.m. on the tenth business day after filing. The chief election
officer may extend the notification period up to an additional five business
days, if the applicants and candidates are provided with notice of the extension
and the reasons therefore.
(e) If the applicant, or any other party,
individual, or group with a candidate on the presidential ballot, objects to the
finding of eligibility or disqualification the person may, not later than 4:30
p.m. on the fifth day after the finding, file a request in writing with the
chief election officer for a hearing on the question. A hearing shall be called
not later than 4:30 p.m. on the tenth day after the receipt of the request and
shall be conducted in accord with chapter 91. A decision shall be issued not
later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth day after the conclusion of the hearing.
ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT
1. Barack Hussein Obama, II is not a natural born citizen and is not
qualified to be on the ballot as a Presidential candidate. In 2008, when Mr.
Obama ran for the U.S. presidency, he was never vetted and he never provided any
documentary evidence of his natural born status. Any challenger to his
eligibility, including complainant herein was mobbed with allegations of racism
coming from largely left leaning pro-Obama media. We have seen an unprecedented
level of corruption in all 3 branches of the U.S. government and the government
of HI, which allowed Mr. Obama to get into the White House without any valid
identification papers.
2. The most staggering evidence, is Mr. Obama’s lack of a valid Social
Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number
from the state of Connecticut, a state, where he never resided, which was never
assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify and SSNVS
3. Complainant herein, is Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, attorney and doctor licensed
in the state of California, who is an attorney admitted to the Supreme Court of
the United States, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and Third Circuit Court of
Appeals. Dr. Taitz is a civil rights leader, who is fighting an unprecedented
level of corruption in the government and courts in order to preserve an
unalienable right of U.S. citizens to elect eligible candidates and vote
in fraud free elections. Dr. Taitz is also a Republican candidate for the U.S.
Senate 2012 in the state of California.
4. In 2009 Dr. Taitz received reports from licensed investigators Neil
Sankey and Susan Daniels, which show, that according to most reputable national
databases for most of his life Barack Obama used a Connecticut Social Security
number 042-68-4425, issued in 1977, even though he was never a resident of
the state of Connecticut. In 1977, Social Security numbers were assigned
according to the state where application were submitted. In 1977 Obama was
nowhere near Connecticut, he was a student at the Punahoa school in Hawaii,
where he resided. Additionally, national databases showed another birth
date, associated with this number, a birth date of 1890. In around of 1976-1977,
due to changes in Social Security administration, many elderly individuals, who
never had Social Security numbers before, had to apply for their Social Security
number for the first time in order to obtain Social Security benefits. It
appears, that the number in question was assigned to an elderly individual in CT
around March of 1977, the death of this elderly individual was never reported,
and from around 1980-1981 this number was fraudulently assumed by Barack
Obama. Exhibit 1, Affidavit of Susan Daniels
5. Taitz was a delegate at the Continental Congress Convention in 2009,
where she had a discussion on the matter of Barack Obama’s fraudulent use of the
aforementioned Connecticut Social Security number with a recently retired senior
deportation officer from the department of Homeland Security, John Sampson. Mr.
Sampson provided her with an affidavit, attesting to the fact, that indeed
according to national databases Obama is using a Connecticut Social Security
number, even though there is no reasonable justification or explanation for such
use by one, who resided in Hawaii in and around the time the Social Security
number in question was issued. Exhibit 2 Affidavit of John
Sampson.
6. In 2010, Barack Obama posted on line on WhiteHouse.gov his 2009 tax
returns. As he posted those returns, he forgot to flatten the PDF file, so all
of the layers of modification of the file became visible to the public. One of
the pages contained Obama’s full Social Security number 042-68-4425. Taitz
received an affidavit from Adobe Illustrator program expert Chito Papa,
attesting to the fact, that initially posted tax returns of Barack Obama
contained Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425. While the file
was later flattened and the Social security number can no longer be seen,
thousands of US citizens and individuals around the world were able to obtain
the original file with the full Social Security number.
7. Taitz checked an official site for Selective Service SSS.gov. She
entered name Barack Obama, date of birth 08.04.1961 (Obama’s alleged birth date)
and Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama is using in his
tax returns. She got a verification, showing, that Barack Obama registered for
Selective Service, using this CT SSN. At this point she had three investigator
reports and two US government documents, showing Obama using CT SSN
042-68-4425.
8. Taitz received an affidavit from a witness Linda Jordan, who ran a
E-Verify check for the above Social Security number 042-68-4425. According to
E-Verify, there is no match between Obama’s name and the Social security
he used in his tax returns and his Selective service application.
9. Taitz received an e-mail from a US Army officer, Colonel Gregory
Hollister, whereby he did an independent check and found, that indeed Obama is
using this Connecticut number 042-68-4425. He also, contacted SSNVS (Social
Security Number Verification Systems) and found that the number Obama is using
was never assigned to him. Exhibit 6. Additionally, there is a clear pattern of
Social Security fraud by Obama’s family members and close associates.
Recently Obama’s uncle Onyango Obama was arrested for drunk driving and found to
be using for employment a Social Security number, even though he is an illegal
alien and not allowed to work. Obama’s aunt Zeutuni Obama was stealing tax payer
dollars by living in subsidized housing and using a state of
Indiana-issued Social Security number, even though she is an illegal alien
and was never a resident of the state of Indiana. Obama’s close associate,
mentor and co-board member from Annenberg Challenge, William Ayers, in his book
“Fugitive Days” admitted to creating over a hundred fraudulent Social Security
numbers using names of deceased infants, who did not get their Social Security
numbers before their deaths. “After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was
forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a
fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop
called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID
had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source
of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next
several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois
and North Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people born between
1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were
surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those
poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any
county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I
could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but
they had never applied for a Social Security card.
Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a
year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then
an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences:
a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.” Bill Ayers,
Fugitive Days. Ayers had a whole business of forged social security card making.
It is unfortunate, that the person, occupying the position of the U.S.
president, was using and is using a bogus social security number.
10. For 3 years after his inauguration Obama refused to provide to the
public his long form birth certificate. On April 27, 2011, when Obama posted his
alleged long form birth certificate on line, just as with his tax returns,
he originally did not flatten the file, which means that anyone with an Adobe
Illustrator program on his computer could see layers of alterations in this
alleged “birth certificate”, which looked like a complete joke. Multiple long
form birth certificates from 1961 are available. In those years green safety
paper was not available and was not used. Other birth certificates, as one for
Susan Nordyke, born the next day on August 5, 1961, in the same hospital,
and signed by the registrar on August 11, 1961, show white paper with yellow
aging stains, clear borders, raised seal and a lower serial number. Obama’s
alleged birth certificate is on a safety paper, which was not used in 1961, does
not have a clear border, no raised seal and the serial number is higher,
than the numbers issued later by the same registrar. Exhibit 9
11. Taitz received an affidavit from Adobe illustrator expert Chito Papa
exhibit 7.
It showed layers of alteration of the alleged birth certificate. It showed
a signature of Obama’s mother Stanley Ann D. Soetoro, where it looks, like
Soetoro (her married name by her second husband) was erased, whitened out and
computer graphics was used to add “unham Obama” and a signature “Stanley Ann
Dunham Obama” was created by pasting and filling the blanks with computer
graphics.
12. Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert
Douglas Vogt. Exhibit 8. It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different
types of ink used. Some of the document shows, as gray scale scanning, some as
black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and
kerning, meaning some letters encroaching into the space of other letters, which
is possible only with computer graphics, not with a typewriter used in 1961.
Numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in
question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer
generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different
documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics. It appears, that
Obama used a Social Security number of a deceased elderly individual, as well as
a birth certificate number of a deceased infant. Research pointed to the fact,
that one, Virginia Sunahara was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961 and passed
away the next day. Recently her surviving brother Dunken Sunahara demanded to
see her long form birth certificate, but the department of Health denied the
request, even though it came from a close relative. Department of Health
provided Mr. Sunahara only with a computer generated short form birth
certificate with a serial number, which was suspiciously out of sequence from
all the other numbers issued to infants born August 4, 1961.
13. In spite of numerous demands, Director of Health, Loretta Fuddy refused
to allow the inspection of the original birth certificate of either Obama or
Sunahara in lieu of the alleged certified copy, and the Social
Security administration refused to provide even a redacted application for CT
SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is fraudulently using. It is imperative, that
this office investigate not only Obama, but also director of Health Loretta
Fuddy, registrar Alvin Onaka, Deputy attorney General Nagamine and former
Chairwoman of the Democrat National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, who
certified Obama’s prior certificate of candidate, as well as Attorney General
Eric Holder, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, and a number of
judges involved in this affair, for purpose of criminal prosecution for
conspiracy to commit fraud, uttering of forged documents, alteration/forgery of
documents, elections fraud and Social Security Fraud.
14. Based on all of the above, Obama does not have any valid
identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot,
running for the US Presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections
law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
15. Additionally, many believe, that “Natural Born Citizen,” as it is
applied to the U.S. Presidency, means one born in the country regardless of
citizenship of the parents. Taitz submits evidence, that from the time of the
adoption of the constitution until today, the standard was: One born in the
country to parents who are citizens, who do not owe allegiance to other
nations.
16. The US Constitution was largely based upon the book “the Law of
Nations” by Emer De Vattel, stating that Natural born citizens are ones born in
the Nations to citizens (Emer De Vattel “The Law of Nations” p499, §212). A
similar definition was used by John A. Bingham, creator on the 14th
amendment, who stated during congressional hearings of the 14th amendment, that
a “natural born citizen is born in the U.S. territories to parents, who didn’t
owe allegiance to other sovereignties”. Similar definition was used in a case of
Minor v Happerset 88 US, 162 (1875) heard by the Supreme Court. Lastly, in
2008 citizenship of John McCain was questioned as well due to his birth in the
zone of the Panama canal. In a joint Senate Resolution 511, the Senate
unanimously found Senator McCain to be Natural Born U.S. citizen. The Senate
used the same Vattel two prong test and found McCain to be eligible for
presidency due to the fact that he was born in the f Panama Canal zone to two
parents, who were U.S. citizens. Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen. He
never even had a “Green Card”. He was in U.S. for a few years, on a student visa
and as such, Obama did not satisfy either one of the two prongs of the test for
natural born status. Even if this office was to subscribe to a more liberal
modern definition of a natural born citizen, Obama does not qualify as he never
proved his birth in Hawaii and is using a computer-generated forgery instead of
a valid long form birth certificate and he is fraudulently using a Social
Security number, which was never assigned to him.
CONCLUSION
1. Petitioner is seeking an emergency hearing.
2. Petitioner is seeking an evidentiary hearing and production of the
original long form birth certificate and microfiche copy of such original birth
certificate of Barack Hussein Obama to be presented at the hearing.
3. Production of the immigration and naturalization and passport records of
Mr. Obama, in order to ascertain, whether there was ever a legal change of name
from Soetoro, Soebarkah to Obama
4. Original application to Connecticut SSN 042-68-4425, which Mr. Obama is
using in his tax returns and selective service certificate, which is not
assigned to him according to E-Verify
5. Modification of rules/ regulations for candidate eligibility
verification/authentication, in order to stop elections fraud and forgery and
assure the citizens of the United States integrity of the elections process
Respectfully Submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
11.12.2011